Modern Warfare Games Battle

The release of Modern Warfare 2 has significantly up the ante for action FPS games permenantly, especially for ones based around the concept of modern fighting, but now a true contender for FPS crown has appeared in the guise of Battlefield: Bad Company 2. Here's a brief comparison of the two, and my verdict as to which one is worth getting:

Graphics: MW2 looks grim, stunning and disturbing all at the same time, but pushes both the 360 and PS3 to their graphical limits. Bad Company also looks great, but the limited number of setpieces prevents it from winning this contest. Winner: COD

Game-Play: Obviously both of these games focus on the concept of Modern Warfare, but COD's cinematic setpieces and Battlefield's focus on grenade launchers and RPGs set both titles apart. The former does well in creating a movie-like atmosphere, but Bad Company's focus on fun and exhilirating levels manages to keep things even more interesting. Winner: Battlefield

Storyline: Clearly MW2 has the upper hand here, as Bad Company's focus on comedic and unrealistic plot to make the whole experience of war more lighthearted (while working well) doesn't acheive the same blockbuster moments. Winner: COD

Multiplayer: At first glance COD seems to have the upper hand, but Battlefield's squad-based missions available on multiple maps eventually give it a much-deserved win. Winner: Battlefield

The Verdict: If you're looking for an amazing single-player plot experience, head to MW2. If you, however, want a fun and long-lasting one go to Battlefield. For multi-player on the other hand, stick with Battlefield, and you'll last for the rest of this year!