‘It all ends here.’ This memorable tagline has been sprawled
across billboards everywhere recently, aping Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2’s promotional campaign
in a rather vast attempt to lend an air of epic grandeur to the final
instalment of another blockbuster franchise. When it comes down to it, The Hangover: Part III has almost no
right to exist, the third entry in a trilogy which arguably needn't have ever
been continued past its première. The
Hangover (5/5) redefined the comedy genre, while its follow-up Part II (4.5/5) managed to pull new
tricks while sticking to its predecessor’s formula, so it was always going to
be interesting yet somewhat worrying to discover just what director Todd
Phillips had in store for the series’ crescendo.
The result, then? Part
III turns out to be something of a ‘middle ground’ between a road trip
comedy flick and surprisingly that of a heist jaunt as well. We’re thrust into
a wildly different initial perspective on events by opening with a rediscovery
of how Leslie Chow is doing in his prison escape, only to then be thrust back
into familiarity with an intervention staged as resident man-child Alan’s post-medication
antics cause a rather depressing event to occur. As has always been the case
for the franchise’s narratives, for the Wolfpack things can never go according
to plan, and sure enough faster than you can say “Carlos”, Phil, Stu, Alan and
Doug are driven off the road into the desert, with the three leads tasked with
finding Chow as Doug is taken hostage once more.
If all of that exposition seems rather more convoluted and
layered than the simple premises the past two films provided viewers with, that’s
because that is essentially the case here. For all its ambition, this third
entry loses some of its franchise’s trademark humour in the transition to a
more linear and action-fuelled storyline structure. There are one or two
moments of innocent recalling of the chaos and hilarity that ensued in the
original- one setpiece involving Chow parachuting above Las Vegas while stoned
is a memorable example- but these are often swiftly placed to the sidelines in
favour of accessible and slightly deeper storytelling. For some Summer
blockbusters, the balance of comedy and action can be a positive and
supplemental aspect which shows off an intelligent screenplay, yet for a
franchise so renowned for its comedy as The
Hangover to take such a divisive tonal swerve simply feels strange and
out-of-character in a detrimental manner.
Perhaps if the main cast performances were suitably strong
once again, I’d take less issue with Part
III’s shortcomings. That it often felt as if many of the main cast weren't
even that interested in returning for yet another ‘lost night’ (albeit with no
proper hangover to be found until the post-credits sequence), then, doesn't do
the production any favours whatsoever. Zach Galifinakas’ performance is
unmistakably governed by a rather farcical depiction of his character in the
script, while Bradley Cooper and Ed Helms’ characters feel like little more
than afterthoughts in terms of character arcs when compared to Ken Jeong’s
ever-increasing presence as the unhinged Chow. It’s a shame, particularly as
even Jeong gets done a disservice this time around by having Chow taken too far
on the road to insanity to ever truly reclaim the intense sense of comedy his
character initially had in the 2009 original. Besides those leads, Justin
Bartha (Doug), Heather Graham (Jade), Mike Epps (Black Doug) and John Goodman
(Marshall) all provide virtually humourless turns thanks to the script offering
them no opportunities to spark even a chuckle amongst the audience.
What’s ultimately most disappointing with regards to this flawed
motion picture as a whole is that there are certainly strengths on offer here.
Once again, Todd Phillips’ direction of events and their surroundings here is
exceptional to say the least, and this writer/director clearly has reverence
for the past franchise efforts as we get a couple of neat homages to Parts I
and II throughout. The ending sequence also does the franchise proud for
certain, so that’s a redeeming feature. Nevertheless, The Hangover: Part III seems to tremble under the weight of its
franchise’s success, and the result is something which merely falls in the
realm of satisfactory enjoyment for franchise fans, a far cry from the
genre-defining piece of comic gold which adorned our screens a short four years
ago.
3/5
No comments:
Post a Comment